In the third part of the role-playing sequence, participants shift into a more pragmatic and emotionally charged exchange, and the facilitator’s frame becomes flexible enough that the group moves between role-based debate and direct, solution-oriented contributions. One participant steps briefly out of character to propose a concrete measure, suggesting the need for more bus lines, which marks a transition from enactment to actionable ideas. Another participant expresses strong emotions about perceived negative cyclist culture and argues for clearer, better-defined cycling lanes, bringing to the surface tensions between different road users and questions of spatial organisation and fairness in public space. At the same time, the discussion remains ambivalent rather than purely critical, as participants also acknowledge Ljubljana’s strengths as a bike-friendly city while naming everyday frictions. Safety concerns are articulated as well, with participants linking mobility conflict to vulnerability and slower reaction times, which reframes frustration as a matter of risk and accessibility. 

F=Facilitator, P=Participant